1 We have said, in the first chapter, that silence belongs absolutely to the world of being, that it is characterized by pure being. The ontological power of silence enters into the things that are in silence. The ontic in things is strengthened by silence; the exploitable in things is far from the world of silence. It is no match for silence; it can do nothing against silence. Being and silence belong together. Ages no longer related to silence, like the modern age, do not bother about the ontic in things. They are concerned only with the profitability, the exploitability, and the revolutionary possibilities in things. The older peoples in which a man was more and became less, had a more childlike and a more modest and humble sense of the gifts of heaven. (Jean Paul) The whole of a thing is in its being, but only a small part of the total being of a thing is taken up into its becoming, and the word that describes becoming only approaches the reality of a thing in so far as parts of the being of a thing are in the becoming. "Being is related to becoming, as truth is to fancy." (Plato Timaeus). True, it seems today that Existentialism is concerned with being, but it is not real being, but only parts, attributes of being, such as dread, care, death, insecurity—with which it is concerned; and these are artificially enlarged, made into absolutes, so that in fact they swallow up real being altogether. 2 Every object has a hidden fund of reality that comes from a deeper source than the word that designates the object. Man can meet this hidden fund of reality only with silence. The first time he sees an object, man is silent of his own accord. With his silence, man comes into relationship with the reality in the object which is there before ever language gives it a name. Silence is his tribute of honor to the object. This hidden fund of reality cannot be taken up into human language. Man does not lose anything because he cannot express this hidden fund of reality in words. Through this literally unspeakable fund of reality man is brought into relationship with the original state of things before the advent of language, and that is important. Furthermore, this hidden fund of reality is a sign that things are not created and not combined by man himself. If things were due to man's creation, he would know them absolutely in language. In a world in which silence is still an active force, a thing is related more with silence than with other things. It stands on its own, belongs to itself more than in the world without silence, where things are interconnected but no longer in relation to silence. In the world of silence a thing offers its being to man directly; it stands immediate- ly before him as though it had just been brought by a special act out of the silence. It stands out clearly against the background of silence. There is no need to add any- thing to it to make it clear. 3 The eye that comes from the broad surface of silence sees the whole, and not merely the parts, because it sees with the broad, all-embracing gaze of silence itself. The word that comes out of silence embraces the object with the original power that it receives from silence, and the object adds something of this power to its own substance. When the world has lost its original relationship with silence it becomes pure sound and can touch only the surface of the object; it merely adds a label to the object. These word-sounds and word-labels then lead a life of their own amongst themselves as though the things they purport to describe did not exist at all. The things also lead a life of their own, thing with thing; for, when the word has been destroyed by separation from silence, it is no longer able to contain the thing it describes, and the thing becomes detached from the word. It loses all pro- portion and exceeds its own natural limits. Thing begins to produce thing (as in the world of today), as if man no longer existed at all. No thing seems newly created any longer—not even new things, since all things are like a mere particle in an everlasting succession of things. Therefore every thing seems boring and superfluous. Things themselves turn away from man. The old statues of the gods in a museum, for example: they stand there sometimes as though they were conspiring against man. They stand detached like a white wall with nothing to say to man. That is the uncanny and the satanical thing about this detached world of things: it impresses man merely by its size and mass. But pure, detached factuality is fatal. It erodes and destroys the world's resources. Two menacing structures face each other today: the non-world of verbal machinery, which is out to dissolve everything into the noise of words, and the non-world of mechanized things, which, detached from language, is waiting only for a loud explosion to create a language of its own. Just as a mute sometimes cries so loud that he seems to be tearing his own flesh in an attempt to achieve the power of speech, so things crack and explode today as though they were trying to burst forth into sound—the sound of doom.